titanz
/
matrix-docker-ansible-deploy
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create tag ${ searchTerm }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from '1dd1f9602f'
${ noResults }
matrix-docker-ansible-deploy/roles/matrix-nginx-proxy/tasks/validate_config.yml

18 lines
856 B
Raw Normal View History Unescape

Make matrix-nginx-proxy role independent of others The matrix-nginx-proxy role can now be used independently. This makes it consistent with all other roles, with the `matrix-base` role remaining as their only dependency. Separating matrix-nginx-proxy was relatively straightforward, with the exception of the Mautrix Telegram reverse-proxying configuration. Mautrix Telegram, being an extension/bridge, does not feel important enough to justify its own special handling in matrix-nginx-proxy. Thus, we've introduced the concept of "additional configuration blocks" (`matrix_nginx_proxy_proxy_matrix_additional_server_configuration_blocks`), where any module can register its own custom nginx server blocks. For such dynamic registration to work, the order of role execution becomes important. To make it possible for each module participating in dynamic registration to verify that the order of execution is correct, we've also introduced a `matrix_nginx_proxy_role_executed` variable. It should be noted that this doesn't make the matrix-synapse role dependent on matrix-nginx-proxy. It's optional runtime detection and registration, and it only happens in the matrix-synapse role when `matrix_mautrix_telegram_enabled: true`.
6 years ago
---
- name: (Deprecation) Catch and report renamed settings
fail:
Add support for more flexible container port exposing Fixes #171 (Github Issue).
6 years ago
msg: >-
Make matrix-nginx-proxy role independent of others The matrix-nginx-proxy role can now be used independently. This makes it consistent with all other roles, with the `matrix-base` role remaining as their only dependency. Separating matrix-nginx-proxy was relatively straightforward, with the exception of the Mautrix Telegram reverse-proxying configuration. Mautrix Telegram, being an extension/bridge, does not feel important enough to justify its own special handling in matrix-nginx-proxy. Thus, we've introduced the concept of "additional configuration blocks" (`matrix_nginx_proxy_proxy_matrix_additional_server_configuration_blocks`), where any module can register its own custom nginx server blocks. For such dynamic registration to work, the order of role execution becomes important. To make it possible for each module participating in dynamic registration to verify that the order of execution is correct, we've also introduced a `matrix_nginx_proxy_role_executed` variable. It should be noted that this doesn't make the matrix-synapse role dependent on matrix-nginx-proxy. It's optional runtime detection and registration, and it only happens in the matrix-synapse role when `matrix_mautrix_telegram_enabled: true`.
6 years ago
Your configuration contains a variable, which now has a different name.
Please change your configuration to rename the variable (`{{ item.old }}` -> `{{ item.new }}`).
when: "item.old in vars"
with_items:
- {'old': 'matrix_nginx_proxy_matrix_client_api_addr_with_proxy_container', 'new': 'matrix_nginx_proxy_proxy_matrix_client_api_addr_with_container'}
- {'old': 'matrix_nginx_proxy_matrix_client_api_addr_sans_proxy_container', 'new': 'matrix_nginx_proxy_proxy_matrix_client_api_addr_sans_container'}
Ensure matrix_ssl_retrieval_method value is valid We recently had someone in the support room who set it to `false` and the playbook ran without any issues. This currently seems to yield the same result as 'none', but it's better to avoid such behavior.
5 years ago
- name: Fail on unknown matrix_ssl_retrieval_method
fail:
msg: >-
`matrix_ssl_retrieval_method` needs to be set to a known value.
when: "matrix_ssl_retrieval_method not in ['lets-encrypt', 'self-signed', 'manually-managed', 'none']"